A man preventing theft with a security system

As technology continues to evolve, so do the methods we use to ensure the safety and security of our properties. One notable shift in recent years is the increasing reliance on video surveillance systems as a cost-effective alternative to traditional security guard services. In this blog, we’ll explore the return on investment (ROI) associated with replacing a security guard with a comprehensive network of 12 property cameras. Additionally, we’ll examine whether there are benefits to maintaining a balance between security guards and video surveillance.


ROI Analysis: Replacing a Security Guard with 12 Property Cameras


Cost Savings:


Initial Costs: Installing a network of 12 property cameras incurs an upfront investment, but it is often significantly lower than hiring and maintaining a 24/7 security guard presence. Cameras require a one-time purchase and installation, whereas security guard expenses include salaries, benefits, and ongoing training.

Operational Costs: Video surveillance systems have relatively low ongoing costs compared to the continuous payroll associated with security guards. Maintenance and occasional upgrades for cameras are generally more cost-effective in the long run.


Coverage and Monitoring:


Extensive Coverage: Property cameras can be strategically placed to cover a wide range of areas simultaneously, reducing the likelihood of blind spots. This extensive coverage enhances the overall security posture of the property.

Continuous Monitoring: Unlike human security guards who may need breaks or could be momentarily distracted, cameras provide continuous monitoring 24/7. They don’t suffer from fatigue or lapses in attention, ensuring consistent surveillance.


Response Time and Efficiency:


Real-time Alerts: Many modern video surveillance systems come equipped with motion detection and real-time alert capabilities. This allows for immediate notification of any suspicious activity, enabling swift response measures.

Remote Monitoring: Property owners or security personnel can remotely monitor the surveillance feed, responding promptly to incidents without the need for physical presence on-site.

Balancing Security Guards and Video Surveillance:


While the replacement of security guards with property cameras offers compelling cost savings and efficiency, there are instances where a hybrid approach is beneficial:


Human Element:


Deterrence: The visible presence of security guards can act as a deterrent to potential criminals, providing a human element that cameras alone may lack.

Immediate Intervention: In certain situations, a security guard’s ability to intervene physically may be crucial, especially when dealing with interpersonal conflicts or urgent matters.

Crisis Management:


Emergency Response: Security guards are trained to handle various emergencies, from medical incidents to natural disasters. Their on-site presence can be invaluable in managing unforeseen crises.



The decision to replace a security guard with property cameras depends on the specific needs and priorities of a property owner. While video surveillance systems offer cost-effective solutions and enhanced efficiency, the human element provided by security guards should not be underestimated. Striking a balance between security guards and modern surveillance technology can result in a comprehensive and effective security strategy that maximizes the return on investment and ensures the safety of the property and its occupants.